When did you last buy something from a supermarket? Chances
are it wasn’t long ago: most retail spending goes through a supermarket
checkout. In a recent article, we
present a detailed case study of one UK supermarket’s long reach down its
supply chain, examining its work on embedding sustainability in the (nine-step)
supply chain for lamb. We use the concept of governmentality to examine
systematic ways of exercising power and authority, paying attention to the way
sustainability is promoted within the company. We explore how senior
decision-makers frame and use sustainability accounting to embed sustainability
in the supply chain, but find that they reformulate their arguments primarily
in economic (rather than social or environmental) terms. Whilst this is
unsurprising, the inability of a supermarket publicly committed to
sustainability to change the conversation suggests that using ‘sustainability’ to reconfigure
business priorities could turn out to be a wolf in sheep’s clothing.
Spence, L. and Rinaldi, L. (2014) Governmentality in Accounting
and Accountability: A case study of embedding sustainability in a supply chain,
Accounting, Organizations and Society.
39(6): 433-452.
Links: Open access version; published article.
Click to read more about this paper below the cut
Credit: GrahamPics1; used under CC licence. |
Around 60% of retail spending goes through a supermarket
checkout, whether online or in store, and the figure is growing. Grocery food
retailers, to give them their full name, have the potential to influence not
just the consumers who purchase their goods, but the many, many thousands of
companies who supply them. This is not really news – we have long heard stories
about how big supermarkets influence their suppliers to drive down prices. What
is newer, however, is the idea that supermarkets can influence the
sustainability of the companies that put products on their shelves. Coupled
with this, the global focus on food security means that pushing sustainability
up supply chains is a hot topic indeed. In an article recently published in the
journal Accounting, Organizations and
Society, we present detailed research of how one UK supermarket sought to
embed sustainability in the – relatively simple - lamb supply chain. In trying
to tease apart what might go on in such a process, we used the theoretical lens
of governmentality from the work of French philosopher, Michel Foucault. Applying
four analytics, or aspects of governmentality identified by Mitchell Dean,
enables us to make visible the hidden meaning, power and controls embedded in a
process of change such as the implementation of a supply chain sustainability
programme.
“Our single biggest impact (on the environment) is the goods
we source”
The potential impact that they could have on sustainability
was not lost on our supermarket case study, they recognized the power they had
to improve sustainability throughout their supply chain and were engaged in a
programme to implement such a change. Even in a relatively simple supply chain
like that for lamb, there is much more to it than a connection from farmer to
supermarket shelf. This chain, for example, includes a whole host of companies
which process the meat, and may also involve several different farming
operations which specialise in different aspects of the animal’s growth.
So the first point to note is that with the best will in the
world, accessing and influencing all the suppliers in a chain - which is just
one of tens of thousands of products which a supermarket might stock – is no
mean feat. How, then did this relatively successful supermarket make an
discernible progress? Table 1 summarises what we found, but to cut a long story
short, there were four aspects which we drew from governmentality. First we
identified how the visibility of sustainability was heightened by the actions
of the supermarket, by for example, packaging sustainability as an econompic
issue and thereby giving it immediate credibility as a discussion point for the
business. Second we noted the technical ways in which sustainability was
embedded in the system through training, auditing, compliance programmes and
financial incentives for suppliers. Third we looked at the nature of knowledge,
language and rhetoric around sustainability and how these were used by the
supermarket, covering for example the way in which qualitative measures were
translated into easier to grasp and convey quantitative ones. Fourth we
unpacked how different identities were adopted and assigned by the people
involved in the supply chain validate the embedding of sustainability.
Table 1: Analytics
of the governing of sustainability within the supermarket’s lamb supply chain
1.
Fields of visibility
|
2.
Techne
|
Sustainability
as an economic issue
Diagrammatic
representations of power and authority
Investment
in embedding sustainability process
Self-portrayal
and external recognition as sustainability leaders
|
Meetings,
training and surveying
Operating
engagement
Auditing
and monitoring
Rule
compliance
Financial
incentives
|
3.
Episteme
|
4.
Identify formation
|
Quantification
of qualitative measures
Quality,
competition and risk
Cost-benefit
analysis
Compensatory
relationship between aspects of sustainability
|
Agents
framed as stakeholders
Stakeholder
labelling and ranking:
· Customer
as principal
· Supermarket
as agent of customer desires
· NGOs
as customer-influencers
· Processor
as conduit of message to farmers
· Farmers
as a valuable commodity
|
“We set our targets by focusing on materiality”
Ultimately what we have found in our case study is that the way
that sustainability can – to a degree at least – be embedded in a supply chain
is to reconfigure sustainability issues in financial terminology, which they
don’t always comfortably fit. But without this the topic lacks credibility and
visibility and is not seen as significant or relevant. On one level this is no
great surprise. On another, it shows just how far we are from a new business
model around sustainability when even a powerful company apparently committed
to sustainability can’t really change the conversation. It does seem a pity
though, that the hopes around sustainability as a way to reconfigure business
priorities and address responsibilities around runaway climate change, resource
depletion and social injustice could turn out to be – excuse the irresistible
pun – just a wolf in sheep’s clothing.
Laura J. Spence is Professor of Business Ethics
and Director of the Centre for Research into Sustainability. Leonardo Rinaldi
is Lecturer in Accounting and Director for the MSc in International Accounting.
They are both based in the School of Management, Royal Holloway, University of
London.
No comments:
Post a Comment